Disimissal Tag

Published on Sole24Ore – NT Lavoro – on 01/11/2022. For the legitimacy of the dismissal for suppression of job and the ascertainment of the repechage impossibility it must be verify the lack of job positions respective to the duties assigned to the employee and carried out by him. In the case decided by the Court of Cassation, with the judgment n. 30950 of 20 October 2022...

Published on Sole24Ore – NT Lavoro – on 14/09/2022. The way in which the dismissal is communicated cannot be the subject of witness proof, since it is an act for which the written form ad substantiam is required. Thus, the Court of cassation with its judgment no. 26532/2022.

Published on Sole24Ore – NT Lavoro – on 29/08/2022. The intention to dismiss can be communicated to the employee indirectly, since there is no burden on the employer to adopt sacramental formulas. Thus, the Court of cassation with its judgment no. 24391 of 5 August 2022.

Quotidiano del Lavoro – Il Sole 24 Ore, 18 June 2021 – Marco Tesoro

Court of Cassation, Employment Section, Judgement 7 April 2021, no. 9304 Serious violation of the highway code while driving a company car constitutes grounds for dismissal for just cause – albeit reasons unrelated to the job.

Quotidiano del Lavoro – Il Sole 24 Ore, 12 April 2021 – Marco Tesoro During the dismissal ban, the dismissal for failing the probationary period is null if the employee proves the company's need to reduce costs. Tribunal of Rome, 25 March 2021